碰撞诱导解离和高能碰撞解离方式进行蛋白质组学分析的比较

Comparison of Collision Induced Dissociation and High Energy Collision Dissociation for Proteomic Analysis

  • 摘要: 为了比较碰撞诱导解离(collision induced dissociation,CID)和高能碰撞解离(high energy collision dissociation,HCD)两种离子裂解模式在蛋白质组学分析方面的差异,分别应用这两种模式对牛血清白蛋白和细胞裂解物进行分析。通过比较所鉴定到的多肽和蛋白数目,发现在牛血清白蛋白中,HCD碎裂方法所得的谱图匹配率和多肽Mascot得分均较高,表明其质谱图质量较好。在复杂样品细胞裂解物分析中,CID碎裂方法鉴定到的谱图数、多肽数和蛋白数目均较多,表明该模式的灵敏度较高;HCD碎裂方法所得的谱图匹配率和Mascot得分均较高,表明其质谱图质量较好。因此,这两种模式均可用于大规模蛋白质组学分析,CID模式可提供更高的灵敏度,而HCD模式则可获得更高质量的质谱谱图。

     

    Abstract: To comprehensively compare the difference of collision induced dissociation (CID) and high energy collision dissociation (HCD), the tryptic digests of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and cell lysates were analyzed by LTQ-Velos Orbitrap. The HCD fragmentation identified more peptides and this mode showed higher MS/MS success rate and higher Mascot score in the tryptic digests of BSA. The results demonstrated that the HCD fragmentation has higher MS/MS spectra quality than CID. But in the tryptic digests of cell lysates, the CID fragmentation identified more MS/MS spectra, peptides and proteins, which indicated that it produces higher sensitivity. The HCD fragmentation shows higher MS/MS success rate and higher Mascot score distribution, demonstrating higher quality of MS/MS spectrum. Therefore, based on these findings, both CID and HCD modes could be used for large-scale proteomic analysis. The CID mode has higher sensitivity, and HCD mode can achieve higher quality of MS/MS spectrum.

     

/

返回文章
返回