超声辅助胶内酶切方法的优化及其酶切特点的分析

Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted In-Gel Digestion Method and Analysis of Peptide Characteristics

  • 摘要: 分别应用20、100和200 W超声功率对牛血清白蛋白以及人尿蛋白组的胶内条带进行胶内酶切,通过比较不同功率鉴定的多肽数和蛋白数,确定最优的超声功率。同时比较超声辅助酶切与传统过夜酶切方法,并分析超声辅助胶内酶切方法的特点。结果表明,超声功率为20 W时对胶粒破坏最小,样品损失最少,在牛血清白蛋白样品中鉴定的多肽数最多为65。在人尿蛋白组2个条带中,20 W方法鉴定的蛋白数分别为168和199,鉴定效果最优。通过对多肽误切率和不完全酶切多肽的定性和定量分析发现,超声酶切方法的误切率高于传统方法,但不完全酶切率较低。通过分析多肽误切位点发现,传统过夜酶切法和超声辅助酶切法的主要误切类型分别为脯氨酸(P)和天冬氨酸/谷氨酸(D/E),3种超声方法之间各种误切类型所占比例均无明显差别。超声辅助酶切可显著缩短蛋白质胶内酶切时间,其中20 W功率超声酶切的效果最佳。与传统过夜酶切法相比,超声辅助酶切多肽的鉴定结果更好,其多肽的误切率更高,不完全酶切率较低,可用于发现蛋白质组学研究。

     

    Abstract: Bovine serum albumin and human urinary protein gel bands of two different molecular weight were digested by 20 W, 100 W and 200 W ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method, and the digested peptides were analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometry. By comparing the number of identified proteins and peptides, the optimal ultrasonic power for ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion was determined. Meanwhile, the peptide characteristics of ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method were analyzed by comparing with traditional overnight digestion method. 20 W ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method shows the minimal gel damage and loss for in-gel protein samples, the number of peptides identified in BSA is 65, while the number of identified peptides from 100 W, 200 W and the traditional overnight digestion methods is 57, 51 and 41, respectively, much lower than 20 W ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method. The number of proteins identified in two different gel bands of human urinary protein in 20 W ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method is 168 and 199, respectively, which is better than 100 W, 200 W and the traditional overnight digestion method. By analyzing the mis-cleavage rate and semi-tryptic rate of peptides based on the qualitative and quantitative analysis, the mis-cleavage rate of ultrasound-assistedin-gel digestion is higher than traditional overnight digestion method, while the semi-tryptic rate of ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion is lower. The mis-cleavage type analysis of identified peptides indicates that traditional overnight method can generate more Proline (P) type mis-cleavage peptides, and ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method produces more aspartate/glutamate (D/E) type mis-cleavage peptides. The mis-cleavage peptide types from three ultrasound powers show no significant differences. Compared with traditional overnight digestion method, ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method can significantly shorten in-gel protein digestion-time and 20 W ultrasonic power shows the best digestion results compared with 100 W ultrasonic power and 200 W ultrasonic power. Furthermore, ultrasound assisted in-gel digestion method can obtain more protein/peptide identifications. The peptide mis-cleavage rate in ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method is higher than traditional overnight digestion method, while the semi-tryptic rate is lower. Above results will benefit the application of ultrasound-assisted in-gel digestion method for proteomic analysis.

     

/

返回文章
返回